显示标签为“spending”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“spending”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月22日星期五

As consumers cut spending, allure products lose 'Green'

Sell that year topped $100 million, and several other important consumer products companies came up with their own "green" cleaning products.

But America's environmental awareness, it turns out, is fickle. How recession taken it faded the consumer's love affair with environmentally-friendly products from recycled toilet paper on organic food to hybrid cars, such as a bad falling in love. While farmers' markets and Prius together now totals are sales, product makers such as Clorox seem mainstream not only budget customers buy green again to convince.

Sales of green works have fallen about $ 60 million a year and those of other similar products from major brands such as arm & hammer, Windex, Palmolive, hefty and scrubbing are bubbles sputtering. "Every consumer says," I would like to help the environment, I am looking for environmentally friendly products,"said David Donnan, a partner in the consumer products practice on the consulting firm A. t. Kearney."But if there is one or two pennies in the price higher, it is not going to buy it. "Is a discrepancy between what people say and what they do."

For example, a 32-ounce Clorox green of bottle of works purpose $3.29 at stop & shop is cleaner. A 32-ounce Fantastik of bottle of cleaner, on the other hand costs $2.89.

In fact, outside one of whole foods market in the Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, June Shellene, 60, said that they will not buy green products as often as it has a few years ago.

"People so are freaked by in the world happen", she said, before their food in a Toyota Prius loaded. Environmentally-friendly products, she said, "This is something you buy and think about if things go swimmingly."

Sales in most consumer goods categories removed during the recession. But according to an analysis of Sanford C. Bernstein & company, certain pénale worse green products.

"You look around disproportionate negative effects of products such as green works, of the major blue chip companies who have tried, in a level offers a green over their conventional range and relatively better performance out of the niche players, that to remain independent", said Stephen powers, Analyst with Bernstein. Data from the Nielsen Company, Bernstein saw sales for almost 4,300 members in 22 categories, such as cleaning spray, liquid soap, bathroom cleaners, and detergents. He studied monthly sales from March 2006 to March 2011, the most recent data available. (Nielsen data includes mass market, grocery stores and pharmacies but includes Wal-Mart.)

Bernstein found that the market share of more environmentally friendly products were generally down from its peak - especially those of the large consumer products company offered. But the market share, as method and seventh generation is relative to the share of the traditional brands green products in categories increase independent brands where they compete from.

"There is no doubt that they have the brands relative to their early efforts, exchange rate stability at the big players such as Clorox, and this is what you will see, the consumer, reflective", said Mr powers.

Green products are more expensive, because the ingredients are generally more cost than their conventional counterparts, and transport costs higher is because they are sold in smaller quantities than the large brands.

Began green household products in the 1980's with brands like seventh generation and simple green, have won a loyal following. Retailers like whole foods expands in the 1990's, took an interest in the environment increases and rivals the fray.

Predicting the market would continue to increase, mainstream manufacturers such as s.c. Johnson, Clorox and Church & Dwight around 2008 introduced eco friendly versions of their products.

But after a first elevator, sales largely discontinued, and the introduction of products slowed down during the recession.


View the original article here

2011年4月9日星期六

Obama signs short-term spending bill

反序列化操作 "translate" 的响应消息的正文时出现错误。读取 XML 数据时,超出最大字符串内容长度配额 (8192) 。通过更改在创建 XML 读取器时所使用的 XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas 对象的 MaxStringContentLength 属性,可增加此配额。 第 1 行,位置为 9093。
Obama signs short-term dealNEWbudget: President makes quick trip to Lincoln Memorial Memorial tea party "not very impressed" with budget dealA temporary measure will keep the government funded through April 15 the deal calls for $38.5 billion in spending cuts

Washington (CNN) - President Barack Obama of signed a short-term funding extension on Saturday hours after Democrats and Republicans narrowly averted a partial shutdown of the federal government by agreeing on the measure and a budget deal.

The new funding extension, which cuts spending by $2 billion, will last through next Friday, April 15.

The Senate immediately passed the extension on a voice vote. The House of representatives followed suit early Saturday morning.

Administration and congressional officials made clear that there would be no lapses in government funding.

In his weekly address Saturday, the president explained that the agreement meant that small businesses can get the loans they need, families can get the mortgages they applied for, "folks can visit our national parks and museums" and paychecks, including those for the military, will be delivered on time.

"This is an agreement to invest in our country's future while making the largest annual spending cut in our history," Obama said.

Behind the scenes of budget battle

The president later made at announced visit to the Lincoln Memorial, where he shook hands, and sprinted down its steps.

"I just want to say real quick that because Congress which able to settle its differences - that's why this place is open today and everybody's able to enjoy their visit," Obama said. "That's the kind of future cooperation I hope we have going forward."

Negotiators capped days of frantic-closed-door talks and public recriminations by agreeing on a framework for a package of $38.5 billion in spending cuts covering the rest of the fiscal year, which expires September 30. The budget deal still needs to pass in both houses, with the expectation that lawmakers will approve it and will the president sign it before the short-term funding measure expires.

The House is scheduled to begin considering that budget deal on Monday, with a vote slated for Wednesday. The Senate would take up the bill at some point after that, said spokesman Jon summers of Senate majority leader Harry Reid's office.

Budget deal: good news, bad news

Republicans, bolstered by their capture of the House of representatives in last November's mid-term elections, had initially pushed for $61 billion in cuts.

A GOP push to strip $317 million in federal funding from planned parenthood failed. Democrats also turned back Republican attempts to get federal dollars currently set aside for family planning and women's health turned into block grants for states.

Such a move would have given governors and state legislatures more ability to cut funding for services opposed by conservatives.

Sources told CNN, however, that leaders of the Democratic-controlled Senate agreed to hold separate votes on both measures, as well as on an initiative to repeal Obama's health care overhaul.

Obama praised the agreement, calling the cuts "painful" but necessary to secure the country's economic future.

This "is what the American people expect US to do," the president said at the White House. "That's why they sent US here."

Zakaria: Proof of broken government?

He also praised the deal as a model of bipartisan cooperation.

"Like any worthwhile compromise, both sides had to make tough decisions and give ground on issues that were important to them," he said.

"This has been a lot of discussion and a long fight," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. Republicans fought to "create a better environment for job creators in our country."

Senate majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, called the deal "difficult but important for the country."

Nevertheless, the furious down-to-the-wire talks portend even tough rounds of negotiations when Congress takes up an increase in the nation's debt ceiling and the fiscal year 2012 budget in the months ahead.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich echoed that thought Saturday. In 1995, Gingrich and Republicans controlling the Senate clashed with President Bill Clinton over the federal government, forcing a shutdown.

"It's the first big step in the right direction," said Gingrich, a possible Republican presidential candidate, of Friday night's legislation. "John Boehner got the largest spending cut in history."

If the negotiations had failed, approximately 800,000 government workers would have been furloughed. A range of government services would have come to halt.

Obama noted earlier in the week that the mechanism of shutting down government operations had already started. On inability to reach a deal would have hurt federal workers, people who rely on government services and the nation's broader economic recovery, he warned.

"For US to go backwards because Washington could not get its act together is unacceptable," the president said.

Top aides on both sides of the aisle had seemed increasingly resigned to the prospect of a shutdown. Congressional staffers started receiving their furlough notices Thursday afternoon.

Friday's agreement to slash $38.5 billion in spending comes on top of two previous funding extensions that included $10 billion in cuts.

Republicans, under pressure from the conservative tea party movement to reduce the size of government, blame Democrats for failing to pass a fiscal year 2011 budget last year when they controlled both the Senate and the House. They also say Obama and his party are ignoring the peril of rising federal deficits and the national debt.

Democrats call the $61 billion in cuts initially pushed by the Republicans extreme and argue reductions of that scale would have harmed the economic recovery while damaging education and innovation programs essential for continued growth.

The budget brinkmanship showed the political stakes of the situation, with both parties trying to depict the other as of have to do what's right for the country.

It also demonstrated the cavernous gap between the two parties on social issues.

Lawmakers react to budget deal

Democrats said the Republican drive to defund planned parenthood proves the GOP is fixated on abortion and other issues related to women's health. Republicans repeatedly insisted that the size of spending reductions which the main cause of the dispute in recent days.

Levi Russell, a spokesman for the tea party Express, told CNN the group isn't "very impressed" with the budget deal and said the agreement proves the party has a lot more work to do to ensure deeper cuts.

Planned Parenthood claimed victory for American women.

"A handful of members of Congress tried to use the debate over our nation's deficit to pursue an extreme agenda that would'nt cut millions of women off from Pap tests, breast exams and birth control - without reducing the deficit," said President Cecile Richards.CNN's Dana Bash, Deirdre Walsh, Ted Barrett, John King, Kate Bolduan, Brianna Keilar, Terry peace, Ed Henry, Dan Lothian and Tom Cohen contributed to this report

View the original article here