显示标签为“Still”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Still”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月24日星期日

Japan: Radiation still high, evacuation zone extended - Xinhua

(Beijing, April 23 Xinhuanet)-more people live in the vicinity of damaged nuclear plant, Fukushima's must next month to evacuate their homes. The decision comes after experts warned that over a large area of the levels of emissions would remain dangerous high.

Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano confirmed that five cities outside of the existing 20 km exclusion zone in the zone evacuation due to the radiation risks involved.

Yukio Edano, Japanese Cabinet Chief Secretary, said "There is a chance that the accumulation of radiation exposure in the area over a year is exceeded 20 millisieverts." "Therefore we have called zone the area fixed evacuation"

The announcement is a day after the Government explained the exclusion zone 20 kilometres a no go area.

Before the order went into effect, residents drove to again deserted hometown in their what I have and well access they could.

People, that the zone type now face fines of up to 12 - hundred dollars, or possible imprisonment for up to 30 days.

Tokyo electric power company President, Masataka Shimizu, visited now an evacuation Center for the first time since the disaster struck.

Few evacuated in the middle of her voice, which him most raised, but did not shy away, him a piece of their mind.

Masataka Shimizu, President, tOKYO electric power company, said, "I am very aware, today, that the relationship and the trust we build with native has completely collapsed." "It is therefore very important, even if it takes a long time now rebuild find ways to get this confidence."

TEPCO is ignoring warnings about the risk one Quake and tsunami striking the plant, and respond poorly to last month's disaster been accused.

The company delivered to stabilize a six to nine - month time frame for the four worst-affected reactors.

(Source: CNTV.CN)

Special report: Massive Quake Shakes Japan

?

View the original article here

2011年4月20日星期三

Liberals could still govern if Harper WINS minority: Ignatieff

Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, said that he would be willing to form a Government under parliamentary rules if Stephen Harper wins the most seats in the election but not unable to win the confidence of the House of Commons.

"If"the Governor wants to call on other parties, or myself, for example, to try and form a Government, then we attempt to form a Government, Ignatieff said Peter Mansbridge for CBC in an interview exclusive Tuesday afternoon."

"This is exactly how the work rules and what I'm trying to say Canadians is, I understand the rules, I respect the rules, I will follow them to the letter and I'm not going to form a coalition.". This I am ready to do so is to speak to Mr. Duceppe and Mr. Layton or even Mr. Harper and say, "we have a problem and here's the plan I want to put before the Parliament, it is the budget I would bring in ' and then 'We take from there. ?

The statement is that the nearest Ignatieff has come to describe how he could become Prime Minister since his first day of the campaign to renounce a coalition with the NDP and the Bloc Québécois.

Ignatieff, who had signed to form a coalition with the NDP supported the block when then-Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion had worked a deal three years ago, says Mansbridge that he later rejected the idea because it was not in the interest of Canadians.

"I could be sitting here and talking to you as Prime Minister and chose not to do that because I felt that it was not in the national interest," he said. "If I have dismissed the coalition in 2008 and I went into this election firmly in 2011 excluding the coalition."

"Mr. Harper had a coalition in 2004 with Mr. Duceppe and Mr. Layton discussions." Not me. ?

Shortly after the interview, the Tories back shot, issuing a statement which said Ignatieff "clearly." it is his agenda to become Prime Minister, even if he loses the election

"Michael Ignatieff ambition to be Prime Minister outweighs everything: our economic recovery, what is best for families, and even how Canadians vote,"said conservatives."."

Ignatieff has also denied he has started a negative campaign against Harper, saying that the question boils down to whether if you can trust the Conservative leader with the authority. The Liberals were forced to modify an anti-Harper announces attack on health care, after it was determined that a quotation has been attributed incorrectly to Harper.

"I think we must be very difficult, I believe that we have to frame the issues. I think that Canadians want to know what choices on 2 may, "Ignatieff said advertisements that his party is running."

"We believe that a strong campaign here is essential."

Pressed Mansbridge Ignatieff on some of the announcements of campaign, the Liberals are running, more specifically those who say Stephen Harper wants to "absolute power".

Ignatieff said Harper closes Parliament twice and held contempt of Parliament. He said that the important issue of the campaign is: "can you trust this guy with power."

"If you can not trust this man with democracy, you can be trusted with anything else," said Ignatieff.

Foundation of the Ignatieff with Mansbridge discussion is part of a series of one-on-one interviews with the leaders of the party. Harper accepted an interview at a time that has yet to be determined.

At the interview, Ignatieff rid of similarities that platform of his party may have with the NDP, saying that, unlike the Liberals table cost the NDP does not add.

But the NDP was quick to offer a rebuttal, saying their platform is not encrypted only, but also third validated.

"Unlike the platform Liberals, it is not making promises non-encrypted several billion dollars (e.g., payment of HST at Quebec, prescription drugs, high speed rail), or it does not ignore two years," the Democrats said in a statement.

"And unlike the Conservatives, it contains no reductions unidentified 11 billion from $.".

Accessibility links

View the original article here

2011年4月2日星期六

Divebombing Hawk not only still gone

Retired Army Brig. Gen. Dud Gordon of Melbourne, Florida, shot this picture of a hawk that has attacked him three times.Army under Brigadier-General dud Gordon of Melbourne, Florida, a hawk who has attacked him three times shot this image in the Ruhestand.Darstellung of the chicks in Florida nest means "new ball game" aggressive male bird has attacked former General three TimesHatchlings in rehabilitation center Sunday shows

(CNN) - dud Gordon just can't seem to beat these birds.

The Melbourne, Florida, resident thought he wanted him, and a red-shouldered Hawk relieves its neighbours Friday, the Divebombing were a brood of the eggs in a tree in Gordon's yard while protecting.

"It happened not gonna today." With a little luck, "a repentant Gordon said morning, on Saturday."

Friday, and the equation of night it changed James Dean, the AAA wildlife set could distance Trapper Gordon not to remove the eggs.

"Last night these eggs, now, newly hatched ball game", said Gordon.

"I thought she had soon due to the behavior of the mother, would be hatching eggs", Dean, said based on Gordon's descriptions.

The original plan was to scare off the adult birds with pyrotechnics, take the eggs and they take in the Brevard County Zoo to be incubated. Now, Dean says he hopes to catch the parents in networks and it moved during the chick passing it to the Audubon Center for birds of prey in Maitland, Florida.

Audubon Society representatives could be achieved not for comment.

James said he would remove the nest from the structure of and donations to the Zoo for an educational exhibition.

The overly protective male Hawk has sunk his claws into Gordon's scalp three times and his neighbours, and has attacked. On Saturday morning during Gordon, Dean and a neighbor were on the lawn ponders after their next step, the bird landed just 15 meters from them, said Gordon.

"The guy brazen, just absolutely brazen,", said Gordon, a former Brigadier General in the army.

There's something about birds and military officers in Florida. Dean said two years ago, he had to get rid of vultures, tried the harassing military brass, a Northrop Grumman Aerospace type establishment in Melbourne, Australia, 25 km south of Cape Canaveral were.

He does not say whether colonels were one of the officers full-bird.

View the original article here

2011年3月31日星期四

Tests Show Irish Banks Still Ailing

Just months after a banking collapse forced an 85 billion euro ($120 billion) rescue package for the country, the Irish central bank is expected to announce on Thursday that the latest round of stress testing shows that the nation’s banks may need 13 billion euros to cover bad real estate debt. On top of the 10 billion euros already granted by Europe and the International Monetary Fund for the banks, that would bring the total bill for Ireland’s banking bust to about 70 billion euros, or more than $98 billion.


Some specialists say the final tally could be closer to $140 billion, an extraordinary amount for a country whose annual output is $241 billion. Trading in shares of Irish Life and Permanent, the only domestic bank to have avoided a state bailout, was suspended Wednesday after reports that it might have to seek government aid as well.


Dermot O’Leary, chief economist for Goodbody Stockbrokers in Dublin, says that Ireland can no longer afford to shoulder the still-growing burden of its banks. The nation’s interest payments are set to rise to 13 percent of government revenue by 2012 — a figure that trails only Greece’s 18 percent, Mr. O’Leary wrote in perhaps the most definitive report to date on Ireland’s financial ills.


“The Irish stress tests will be an important call to arms that shows that it cannot keep putting up the cost for recapitalizing its banks,” he said. “You need burden-sharing with the bondholders. Without that, the debt becomes unsustainable.”


Many proposals have been put forward to deal with the issue, including requiring bondholders to share in losses, as Mr. O’Leary and the new Irish government suggest, and a United States-style stress test with teeth, which would name and shame front-line banks and require them to raise capital.


But European governments have stuck to their position that such measures would further fuel investor fears, rather than calm them.


The second stress test of European banks now under way is beginning to be regarded as too weak, much as the first one was. In the meantime, the condition of the banks is worsening.


In Spain, which is having a brutal housing bust like Ireland’s, fresh data shows that problem loans are growing at their fastest level in a year.


And Portuguese and Greek banks, with their Irish counterparts, have become dependent on short-term financing from the European Central Bank for their survival as their economies deteriorate and doubts increase about their ability to repay their debts.


“Europe hesitates to deal with the banking problem for two reasons,” said Daniel Gros, the director for the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.


“Our policy makers saw Lehman and want to avoid a repeat of the experience at any cost,” he said, referring to the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. “And the weak banks in Germany and elsewhere are too politically connected to fail.”


Irish taxpayers have been left responsible since the government guaranteed all the liabilities of its banks two years ago.


The European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund have refused to accept the notion that investors who bought the bonds of Irish banks, in effect financing their reckless lending, should share the pain with some loss on their holdings.


But a newly elected government has become more vocal in arguing that $29 billion in unsecured senior debt — which is not tied to an asset and as a result is deemed riskier from the start — is ripe for restructuring because the banks that issued it, like Anglo Irish, have essentially failed and been taken over by the government.


So the government should not be obligated to keep paying interest.


It is not clear who owns the senior Irish debt; analysts guess it is a mix of European banks and bargain-hunting hedge funds.


What is clear is Europe’s opposition to imposing reductions in the value of these bonds, often called haircuts. That view was reaffirmed this week when a central bank board member, Jürgen Stark of Germany, described such a move as populist and one that could feed a wider investor panic.


Should investors respond by driving down the value of government bonds from the weaker euro zone economies, the pain would most likely be felt by all. The Continent’s big banks in particular would suffer because many have large piles of sovereign debt, which has yet to be marked down to its market value.


According to Goldman Sachs, European banks hold $270 billion in Greek, Irish and Portuguese bonds.


Greek banks are the most exposed, with $87 billion, mostly in Greek debt, but German banks hold $62 billion in total and French banks $26 billion. Hypo Real Estate, a commercial lender now wholly owned by the German government, is the largest holder of Irish sovereign debt, with $14.5 billion.


With bank lending growth negligible and capital levels thin, especially in the weaker euro zone economies, a fresh round of write-offs is the last thing governments want.


The problem is compounded because banks account for a much larger share of national economies in Europe than they do in the United States.


In Ireland, bank assets are 2.5 times the size of its economy. A recent review of the European banking sector by Morgan Stanley shows that the rest of Europe is also heavily reliant on the health of its banks.


The five largest banks in Britain are 3.5 times the size of the country’s economy, 4.4 times in the Netherlands, 3.25 times in France and two times in Spain. In Germany, the figure is 1.5 times gross domestic product, but that excludes the biggest, Deutsche Bank, which is mainly an investment bank. (The comparable figure for the United States is 60 percent of economic output.)


Spain has managed to separate itself from the malaise surrounding Portugal and others this year by undertaking some aggressive deficit cuts.


But, according to a report this week by Marcello Zanardo, an analyst in London for Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, Spain’s problem loans rose 3.3 percent in January from December, the biggest increase in a year. That brought its bad loans to a 17-year high of 6.06 percent of its portfolio. Nonperforming loans jumped 48 percent in 2009 and 15 percent last year, Mr. Zanardo’s data show, driven by the continuing weakness in Spanish home prices.


While Spanish banks are not in as bad shape as their Irish peers, the government has not yet convinced investors that it has addressed the problem despite steps to force local savings banks to raise capital.


Veterans of the three-and-a-half-year bank crisis in Ireland say that the hardest part is accepting how bad things really are, then taking definitive action.


“We need to accept once and for all that Ireland has 100 billion euros in irrecoverable bank loans,” said Peter Matthews, a financial consultant and recently elected member of Parliament who has long argued that Ireland and Europe are underestimating the scope of the country’s debt problem. “People do not relish a write-down but it is the right way to deal with this.”


View the original article here