显示标签为“Foreign”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Foreign”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月4日星期一

AfPak channel: The dead of the Mazar - foreign policy

It sounds like chaos theory: a fringe extremist religious leaders in the Florida boondocks holds a trial version of the Quran for his role in the 9 / 11, inspiring it sentenced to death and have someone else do it through burn - and on the other side of the world, angry Muslims, might be storm instigated by the preaching of hatred, a combination of "Foreigners" and in the words of the UN spokesman in the BBC television yesterday evening, "hunt" and seven of them to kill. Who would have thought that something like this could be possible after the Nazis were auto-da fé in Berlin 1933 put it the works of Jewish, Marxist and pacifist - short "undeutschen" - authors such as Kurt Tucholsky from climbing, Heinrich Mann, Erich Maria Remarque Erich K?stner, Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx.

What makes so angry people in Afghanistan that she would attack random foreigners, UN staff have to do anything with this fringe Pastor Act?

First, we must consider that most Afghans are very religious. Burning is really the biggest provocation, one from presenting their holy book. Pastor Jones, which seems to be very religious - on his way, too, must this understood his have when he mock trial provocation.

Secondly if demonstrations in Afghanistan are organized, easy to use it for all people in the present circumstances, to infiltrate is and they want to go where they them. It does not mean that the protest and subsequent bloodshed necessarily the work of the Taliban. In fact, the Taliban have rejected any involvement in the murders, while at the same time praised the murderers. But given their atrocities, they are a simple scapegoat. The statements of some Afghan officials the Taliban participation in yesterday's incidents - both the Governors of Kandahar and Balkh - show seem his examples for this kind of finger-pointing. But it is with regard to who the demonstrators who stormed the connection were still too early to conclusions.

One of the reasons why it is so easy to edit real outpourings of popular anger here is for the Afghan general atmosphere at the moment. We see a polarization of parties in this conflict - armed the diverse foreign and insurgent forces - also affect the civilian population of the immediate. There are a lot of trouble after years in which Western a collection of civilian casualties caused military operations. Afghans are admission that something may have gone wrong and then excuses tired of repeated initial denials, then. Compensation may be a nice touch, but it can to not everyone bring back to life.

Moreover, in the last few weeks have such cases seemed unusually often: three cases in Kunar province alone, went more in Helmand and probably a number, the unreported. Then came the pics of the "kill team", US soldiers at forward operating base ramrod province of Helmand, which apparently conspired to have completely innocent passers-by, some of the perpetrators driven by feelings of hatred, to kill revenge and prejudice against Afghans in General. Although the involved are certainly only a small Division of here soldiers deployed (and we should not forget that they are currently trying, and calls a participant already guilty and sentenced were in the prison) I can't help, but from, that this is what war is too young, inexperienced people, who have before for other cultures was made available and in the middle of a conflict they do not understand raised with people they will not understand. But I have a categorization of all Afghans as potential enemies under European, more experienced and well-trained officers, as well as.

This categorization of the "other" is by radical preacher at Afghan mosques, the lump together all "Foreigners" and "Unbelievers" (unbelievers), regardless of what they actually in - whether compared father, son and holy spirit, could believe Shiva Parvati et al, because of likely killed Nepali protects at the UN compound. or "only" the values of the humanitarian work abroad. I'm personally always these conditions tired. Yes, I am a "kafir" and an alien - but I'm also quite different from many others in the category assigned to me.

Outrageous acts have been committed to both the Afghan and "foreign" page, but responsibility is not rest with all groups or categories of people, but instead with individuals. I would like to that Pastor Jones and some of the imams in Mazar and Kandahar would look if their books have something to say about individual responsibility.

Also, I understand that many Afghans all organisations are just sick and tired in their country, of special operations soldiers analysts, none of which they believe really their lives for the better ever changed in Afghanistan. But while the anger of all those involved in this sad story is understandable, the manipulation of this anger is not. And it should not everyone from before its duties free.

Afghan police arrested some of the demonstrators have taken part in the violence in the Mazar - and I hope they pick people not only by chance (the cycle of damage on innocent, turn more would a cycle that created much anger). And since Pastor Jones provocation, which, if not have directly economic dynamism violence seems be protected by the first amendment, nor hope that, despite his public denials of incitement, his dreams are are visited by the pictures of the killed Mazar and, to the present, Kandahar.

Thomas Ruttig is co-director of network analysts Afghanistan, where a version of this post was originally published. He speaks Pashto, and Dari.


View the original article here

2011年3月31日星期四

Retreat for Rebels; Libyan Foreign Minister Quits

The government advance appeared to return control of eastern Libya’s most important oil regions to Colonel Qaddafi’s forces, giving the isolated government, at least for the day, the east’s most valuable economic prize. The rout also put into sharp relief the rebels’ absence of discipline and tactical sense, confronting the United States with a conundrum: how to persuade Colonel Qaddafi to step down while supporting a rebel force that has been unable to hold on to military gains.


But the defection of Moussa Koussa, the foreign minister, showed that at least one longtime confidant seemed to be calculating that Colonel Qaddafi could not last. The news of Mr. Koussa’s defection sent shockwaves through Tripoli on Wednesday night after it was announced by the British government. Mr. Koussa had been a pillar of his government since the early days of the revolution, and previously led the fearsome intelligence unit.


Although American officials suspected him of responsibility for the bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, Mr. Koussa also played a major role in turning over nuclear equipment and designs to the United States and in negotiating Libya back into the good graces of Western governments.


Presumably, he is now in a position to talk about the structure of Mr. Qaddafi’s remaining forces and loyalists. What is unclear is whether his defection will lead to others. “We think he could be the beginning of a stream of Libyans who think sticking with Qaddafi is a losing game,” one senior American official said. “But we don’t know.”


Having abandoned Bin Jawwad and the oil port of Ras Lanuf on Tuesday, the rebels fled helter-skelter before government shelling from another oil town, Brega, and stopped for the night at the strategic city of Ajdabiya. As the rebels retreated in disarray, a senior rebel officer, Col. Ahmaed Omar Bani, pleaded for more weapons. He conceded that rebel fighters had “dissolved like snow in the sand” but framed the retreat as a “tactical withdrawal.”


Vowing that “Ajdabiya will not fall,” he claimed that rebels were still fighting on the east and west sides of Brega, suggesting that pockets of resistance persisted even if the main force had fled.


He acknowledged that the rebels had no answer to the artillery pushing them back unless foreign governments provided parity in arms. “The truth is the truth,” he said. “Even if it leaves a bad taste in your mouth.”


The White House press secretary, Jay Carney, released a statement responding to a report of a presidential finding authorizing covert support for the rebels. It said: “No decision has been made about providing arms to the opposition or to any group in Libya. We’re not ruling it out or ruling it in.”


Whether more weapons or longer-range weapons would make a difference is an open question, however. Leadership and an appreciation for tactics were noticeably missing in the rebels’ battle lines.


Faced with fire, the rebels seemed not to know how to use the relatively simple weapons they had in any coordinated fashion, and had almost no capacity to communicate with one another midfight. Throughout the spontaneous retreats on Wednesday, not a single two-way tactical radio was visible.


The rout put civilians to flight as well. By Wednesday evening, Ajdabiya’s hospital patients were evacuated and a long stream of vehicles packed with forlorn residents filled the road north to Benghazi, the rebel capital.


Abdul Karim Baras, a young man with a crackling bullhorn, tried to buoy their spirits. “God will rescue Libya from this moment!” he shouted repeatedly as he stood on the highway median.


A few of the displaced — many of whom made the same trek a week ago, before the allied airstrikes that reversed the loyalists’ first push — smiled or gave desultory victory signs as they passed through rebels’ disoriented ranks.


There were few signs of renewed airstrikes. But an American military spokesman said coalition warplanes resumed bombing pro-Qaddafi units on Wednesday, without specifying where. “The operation is continuing and will continue throughout the transition” to NATO command, Capt. Clint Gebke said.


C. J. Chivers reported from Brega and Ajdabiya, Libya, and David D. Kirkpatrick from Tripoli. David E. Sanger contributed reporting from Washington; Kareem Fahim from Benghazi, Libya; and Edward Wong from Beijing.


View the original article here