Republic Paul Ryan budget could a turning point, Americans are not ready for the size of the Government, says Ron Haskins SaysHe that ExistsHaskins numbers: problem of spiraling debt, expenditure cuts, revenue increased NeededHe asks whether two parties are cut a deal, or continue to burden future generations with debtEditor's note: Ron Haskins, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, served as a consultant in welfare issues in Congress during the design of the 1996 welfare reform legislation and Senior Adviser of the President for welfare policy in the George W. Bush administration.Washington (CNN) --der budget introduced budget proposal the Republican Chairman of the House Committee, Paul Ryan, Tuesday, is potentially a turning point for the Federal Government and American culture.
The fundamental lesson of the Republican philosophy is that small government is best, as initiative and responsibility the essence of the American vision are based on work, family and community. But explodes because line with this vision, the Government has the founder of our Constitution.
To take just one example, the Federal Government spent only $29 billion to programs for the poor and low-income Americans; until 1962 in 2010, the Federal Government spent $789 billion on these and similar programs, a 27-fold increase. In this example, you could multiply programs, health programs, educational programs, and federal regulations in particular with regard to retirement.
This outpouring of expenditure and development of the authority look at Liberals as a triumph; Conservative and libertarian view both as excessive. Worse still, they think that the programmes give too many people what they should work for themselves, thus reducing the sense of initiative and down sizing of the American vision.
GOP budget plan cuts Medicare, tax rates
At various times in the past, Republicans have tried actually often in accordance with their small government to reign philosophy, in significant political risks. Republicans passed the changes in the federal budget in 1995 by congressional and vetoed by President Clinton, which led Government shutdowns was an example. A successful example was the welfare reform law of 1996 which led to an unprecedented increase in work and reduction in welfare dependency and poverty among single mothers.
Now, the Ryan proposal brings the nation to an another groundbreaking moment. Here is a case where need meets Republican philosophy. The American people seem unwilling to pay that they get for the amount of the Government.
The American people seem unwilling to pay that they get for the amount of the Government.--Ron Haskins
Polls show that Americans increasingly realize that the Government can not continue, identify problems on borrowed money to live, but they, that their new understanding leads to reliance on debt to shrink only by Government can be reduced, Increasing taxes, grows to produce the economy additional revenue or a combination of these three.
The Ryan small government approach calls reduce two of these instruments for debt. He would cut spending from $5.8 trillion in the next ten years, making the deficit of $4.4 trillion in the same period. He would reform the code by lowering the prices for businesses and individuals and removing tax breaks.
Most economists agree that a tax code breaks with less tax and lower rate would be more equitable and efficiency, and is so that the economy is growing, and produce might require additional revenue would improve. But Ryan would increase not taxes, since this would violate the Republican goal of smaller government.
The most radical and politically dangerous Ryan proposals is essential to Medicare, a program change, the health benefits more than 46 million older Americans provides. Is widely agreed, unless we "" the curve bend can spending for health care of the Federal Republic, it finally consumed a part of federal sales unsustainable. Ryan's proposal would this central problem by providing a contribution for older people and that this health insurance on their own, to buy, probably in the Exchange that creates affordable care act under President Obama.
Most likely the Federal Government would a fixed value in the direction of the insurance premium of each, with a higher payout for poorer and sicker people pay. But the State subsidies are not enough savings in the Ryan approach and the increase in the cost, which pay for the elderly, to the entire premium now and in the future, so that the health care.
Democrats attack already proposal of Ryan Medicare, as well as many other proposals in his account. The language of the attacks is already hard and promises, h?rtere. Although Ryan and the House Republican leadership are to erhalten-- and verdienen-- Kudos for the courage, deficit unsustainable serious and risky proposals on the table to the country, they are tested by the onslaught of attacks.
Two of the most important questions now are whether the American public, particularly the tea party and independent, rally the Republican is planning to support reasonable Republicans where to get high-risk way, which are blazing and whether the President is Democrats and use part company with the most Hill on the occasion, revive the balanced proposal his deficit of Commission and serious negotiations.
If so, the crucial question is: can the two parties agree on a budget compromise, the expenditure, revenue increases and tames the State deficit? Republicans are unlikely to support an agreement which is not significantly reduced the size of the Government; Democrats will not support a deal that contains no increases.
Without those created by illusion of indifference towards future generations move and a deal, the nation further on a precipice.
Only you by Ron Haskins are views expressed in this comment.
没有评论:
发表评论