Allan grant, time life pictures, via Getty ImagesMoviegoers in the Park Avenue Theatre in New York in 1946. The complete cinema experience involved, once upon a time, an audience.
In the last month in response to by the way I made about Americans no longer enthusiastic spectators once they were - comparison the 90 million, to the movies every week in 1948 with today's audience, floats the 23 million - Matthew sigman, a self-confessed 'big screen movie fan"from New York, wrote in with a quibble. "I beg to differ is proposed for the statistical basis of your statement, love the Americans not movies, so much as earlier as annual participation has fallen", Mr. sigman wrote.
Film fans in Zebulon, a café-pub in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, for a search. Filmgoing is a group experience less often.He added "back in the 1940s,", "If a film lover enjoyed a movie, she went box office several times, until these figures ratcheting." "Now everything that has to do it is to find House ' legally blonde' or 'Terminator' to stay and watch again and again, just like those of us who can see the Indies love 'Fargo' again and again."
Well, Yes and no, I wrote Mr. sigman, because much of it depends on how you see movies that are discrete works and a social experience. While many of us go to cinemas, the 24-hour film comes now also to us, although sometimes only one person tell us alone at a desk or in a train and staring at a glowing can be displayed. This new portable film is convenient and safe verdrahtet-Up companies such as the new ways they can images with your devices pumps. But it is cinema, like we it history have heard for most.
New digital technologies have transformed, not only how films are shot, processed, edited, distributed and exhibited, but also how they are observed. And this is a change in our world of moving image to have that, because we are all of this change in the middle are difficult to understand. What we do know is that for much of the twentieth century, when we meant about films, we talked glorious, if sometimes scratched images flicker larger than life in the theater screens, we observed with other people and, if the next attraction in rolled, perhaps forever disappeared,. Now we see away digital content on different computers, armed with the new consumer, confidence that everything is a click.
It be difficult, in the on request era point, but once you may see a film again after Theatre, that obsession leave, add a sometimes evanescent object movies to their mystique and makes their. Whether a film distinguished cultural or social significance, it could be in a Museum, classrooms or Repertory Theater, and again appear sometimes as a midnight movie. After the 1940s may also materialize it, badly hacked and cut off, the television. Often, but once the theatre leaving it, it would either sit on a shelf or destroyed (or tossed into the Pacific Ocean), have been so many films - including an amazing 80% or so from the silent film era.
The introduction of the home video cassette recorder in 1975 made it possible, a copy of a thriller rent Hitchcock (at least those from film transfer) at any time you want to only during opening hours. Today you can movies stream - along with TV shows, YouTube clips and videos of your cat - on your computer, phone, and the wieterhin old fashioned TV. "You take the control" a display from AT & T requires a cable option called America's everything (250 channels and 4 movie packages) provides the faith for $104.99 and, as you mass customization, deployment swears quality for millions of subscribers "a customer at a time."
This emphasis is of crucial importance viewers as sovereign individuals. Many factors play in the transformation of people in target groups, including commercial imperative, personal identities, storytelling trends, laws and social customs, and of course technological innovations. Historically, if you wanted to watch a movie, you went to a theater, a ticket bought and sat with other viewers. She waited also: I stood in line for two hours in the cold "Raging Bull" see, when it opened in 1980. Now, you see what you want, whenever you, at the click of want a mouse, touching with a finger. This is cool, although it also feel quite ordinary, even banal can come.
The idea that movies experience something you with other people (unless your name Howard Hughes was) is no longer the truism that it once was. This is not just about body surrounds and sometimes harassing us in darkened theatre and the municipal tears, wheezing and heckling, the part of our laugh. Born at the end of the 19th century, cinema was more than a novelty (though it was): it represented – and a portal to the - a fast-paced urbanized world, which was was on once expanding and new technologies, shrink types of travel and consumption habits. The train made the world more (you could go places) and smaller (people went everywhere), and so also movies.
The links between modernity and films can be detected in a lively passage from the German sociologist, contain Georg Simmel in a valuable anthology of 1995 1903 about the experience in a modern city in his essay "Cinema and the invention of modern life." "the metropolis and mental life" to write, Simmel, as described you offered "the rapid displacement of changing images, the sharp discontinuity in the grasp of a Blickund the surprise of the onrushing impressions." The anthology editors, Leo Charney and Vanessa R. Schwartz, add that it is no coincidence this description evokes cinema (it reminded me of Michael Bay), as "the experience of the city the conditions for the experience of the other elements of the modern set."
Ms. Schwartz expands on the links between modernity and movies in a perceptive essay on some cinemalike glasses - such as wax museums and panoramas-, which were the rage in Paris at the end of the 19th century such as films about came. By far the bizarre of them was the morgue, a new attraction to it with the Eiffel Tower: upwards of 40,000 daily visitors would in a room, where framed behind a large glass window curtains, they two rows of corpses on marble (nominally for identification purposes see would) troops. One of the most popular was that a girl whose clothed skeleton in a red velvet Chair set up and in the night (Presidency included cold).
没有评论:
发表评论